Post by TomLine on Apr 28, 2015 0:31:09 GMT -5
WARTIME ACTIVITY
by Tom Lineaweaver
The Israeli Supreme Court said that the murder of Rachel Corrie was a "wartime activity." Israel: Dangerous Ruling in Rachel Corrie Case
That makes me wonder, since Rachel was an American citizen, was the Israeli Supreme Court suggesting they were at war with the United States in March of 2003 when she was murdered?
Here's part of the article....
The court based its ruling on an Israeli law in force at the time of Corrie’s death that exempted Israel from liability for any act by its forces carried out during “wartime activity.” The Civil Wrongs (Liability of the State) Law, as amended in 2002, defined wartime activity as “any action combating terror or insurrection,” or “intended to prevent terror and hostile acts and insurrection, committed in circumstances of danger to life or limb.”
That makes no sense. Rachel was not a terrorist, an insurrectionist, nor was the bulldozer operator in danger to life or limb from Rachel.
As I said elsewhere, when I am President, Israel will pay for what they did to Rachel.